Welsh Education Minister keeps religious education, makes it compulsory and inserts trans-ideology into the 7-16 curriculum.
You might see her determination to carry it through, despite the criticisms even hostility in the public consultation, in the unsmiling eyes and tight mouth chosen for her picture/
It's not difficult to spot the hidden agenda in cancelling the parents' right (and duty) to protect their children from religious and trans-promotion. The documents use "LGBTQI+" which is Stonewall's latest claim for their 'trans' community. They consulted only Stonewall and not the independent L or LGB organisations, nor did they involve women's organisations like FairPlayForWomen, WomansPlaceUK and Transgendertrend (this latter has excellent record and experience of schools material; all are hated by transactivists).
The covert trans-agenda was blurted out by an LGBT-campaigner journalism student, over from Wisconsin - 3rd Sept student piece and 7th Nov. article. This Christian Phelps seems unaware that in Wales and the UK, the trans-cult has to be more circumspect.
What of the independent reports of the public consultation? The main one is a travesty – written by a group (WaveHill) without expertise. The Young People’s report shows that even the youth parliament warned against compulsive religions, but were ignored. Pleas for non-religious/atheist views were likewise spurned.
Humanists UK, who campaign for a secular state, said they are "particularly concerned about the scrapping of the right to withdraw from RE in faith schools, because such schools will still be able to teach the subject from a faith-based perspective".
You might see her determination to carry it through, despite the criticisms even hostility in the public consultation, in the unsmiling eyes and tight mouth chosen for her picture/
It's not difficult to spot the hidden agenda in cancelling the parents' right (and duty) to protect their children from religious and trans-promotion. The documents use "LGBTQI+" which is Stonewall's latest claim for their 'trans' community. They consulted only Stonewall and not the independent L or LGB organisations, nor did they involve women's organisations like FairPlayForWomen, WomansPlaceUK and Transgendertrend (this latter has excellent record and experience of schools material; all are hated by transactivists).
The covert trans-agenda was blurted out by an LGBT-campaigner journalism student, over from Wisconsin - 3rd Sept student piece and 7th Nov. article. This Christian Phelps seems unaware that in Wales and the UK, the trans-cult has to be more circumspect.
Let's remember that Kirsty Williams signed up to be a ‘Stonewall ally’. She runs
a department whose Equality Impact Assessment is based on Stonewall’s
bastardisation of the Equality Act. It
conflates Sex/Gender and redefines Gender Reassignment as “the act of
transitioning and Transgender people”. They don't let on this is the hoary old error of citing the Dept for Education in England and ignoring modern guidance from the EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission). The EqIA adopts Stonewall’s fiction of LGBTQI+ and states quite
wrongly that “the rights of LGBTQI+
people to be treated with equality are protected in law”. In fact, the
Equality Act gives the LGB group the right to recognition of their Protected Characteristic,
uncontaminated by TQI+.
So what did Kirsty Williams do in view of trenchant criticism of the EqIA? She just
got her trans-people to mark their own homework and re-summarise the same nonsense. Evidently their signing up to Stonewall means
the Welsh Education officials can’t be trusted an inch.
Qualification is having an offshoot in Aberaeron and some bilingual ability |
Humanists UK, who campaign for a secular state, said they are "particularly concerned about the scrapping of the right to withdraw from RE in faith schools, because such schools will still be able to teach the subject from a faith-based perspective".
The consultation gave a childish excuse for forcing eg. christianity on islamic children, that their parents “may have option to send their
children to a (muslim) faith school”. As the document admits "There
is no current equivalent option for parents of other faiths to send their child
to a school where RSE (or RE) will be taught in a way which reflects the tenets
of their faith, while being pluralistic, within the maintained school system in
Wales." With no practical prospect of a slew of new faith schools to 'fill the gaps', the demand for the right-to-withdraw will be unstoppable. Faith groups, gender-critical humanists, feminists and LGBers unite!
telling a child they can choose their sex or they may be 'born in the wrong body' is not just unscientific but also dangerous. It encourages children onto the transgender pathway with huge consequences for their future that they cannot possibly understand.
She expects public discord and disruption to education (despite smooth talk of care in managing parents). She would set back prospects of community integration. The costs of an epidemic of teenage girls wanting to trans (as in Canada), costs to the NHS as well as long-term stunting of the girls, are not faced. And the Welsh Government is likely to face the Courts for flouting the rights of the child against indoctrination (CEDAW Convention) and parental responsibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment